Order:
  1.  9
    Postponed Withholding: Harmful for the Infant and Increasing the Complexity of Decision-Making.Lien De Proost, Eline Bunnik, Angret de Boer & E. J. Verweij - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (11):56-59.
    Syltern et al. (2022) propose a new approach to decision-making at the limit of viability: by default, intensive care will be initiated for every infant born in “the gray zone” of viability. This w...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  25
    Viability, abortion and extreme prematurity: a critique.Lien De Proost, E. J. Verweij, Rosa Geurtzen, Geertjan Zuijdwegt, Eduard Verhagen & Hafez Ismaili M’Hamdi - forthcoming - Clinical Ethics.
    This article examines the ethical validity of using viability as the cutoff point for abortion in the Netherlands, in view of potential changes to the Dutch perinatal care guideline. According to the Dutch Penal Code, abortion is permitted until viability: the point at which a fetus can survive outside the womb with technological assistance. Since the law was enacted in 1984, viability has been set at 24 weeks gestational age. Currently, in the Netherlands, the treatment limit for extreme prematurity is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  13
    Lost in Gestation: On Fetonates, Perinates, and Gestatelings.Lien De Proost & Geertjan Zuijdwegt - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (5):108-110.
    Recent discussion on artificial womb technology (AWT) has given rise to a proliferation of terms to denote the subject of AWT. De Bie et al. opt for “fetal neonate” or “fetonate’ as “the best way t...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark